Recomendações de Freud aos psicólogos que exercem a psicanálise

Abstract

Psychoanalysis is frequently presented on psychologist training as theory in which is possible to sustain a direction of a practice; this theory, however, is grounded by its own parameters, instituted from clinical experience, and should not be taken as closed concepts, but as guidelines and recommendations to sustain a practice that takes as a standpoint the concept of unconsciousness. Starting of the questions “who analyses today?” brought by Lacan in its text "The direction of treatment and the principles of its power", from 1958, in which he highlights the need to resume Freudian guidelines, it was pointed out as a research problem the following question: to wich parameters must the psychologist be submitted to guide a psychoanalytic practice? Considering the development of this question, it was established as main goal: place, as from the return to Freud by Lacan, beacons to think guidelines to psychoanalytic treatment, to point out how psychologists can guide a practice in psychoanalysis on the present day. For that, it was proposed as specific goals: present some

of the main concepts that surround the theory of the practice proposed by Freud and re- established by Lacan, through its studies of linguistics, to move forward on psychoanalytic

theory, starting from the formulation that the unconsciousness is structured as language; to understand the psychoanalytic treatment as sustained by the parameters of language and listening. Indicating the transference and interpretation as operators of the analyst and guide of this paper. It is a qualitative and bibliographic research, and its development comes from the research on psychoanalysis, that is specified and sustained by the parameters from the clinical experience, free association and floating attention. From that, a psychoanalytic practice is possible when are taken as ground rules the freudian recommendations, reinterpreted by Lacan afterwards., based on the proposal of the existence of the unconsciousness as an instance wich overlaps the psychic functioning. Considering that the languange passes through the speaker, showing that psychic functioning is marked by dialectic, as the constitution of the subject happens as an effect of the incidence of the significant, that install the neurotic division, an hiatus through the Edipo Complex – castration, amongst an egoic instance, imaginary (moi) and the subject of the unconsciousness (je). Therefore, it is a paper about neurosis. The psychologists job on the psychoanalytic practice is sustained by the management of transference and interpretation, as the difference amongst je and moi aims as the subjects functioning, in what he brings an structural positioning, singular, marked by the incidence of the significant, and to which it sees as summoned to return. Thus, it is pointed out that the work on psychoanalysis, independently of where it takes place, is implied on telling this structural position from the subject as the guidelines to this work.