<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <title>TEDE Coleção:</title>
  <link rel="alternate" href="https://tedebc.ufma.br/jspui/handle/tede/637" />
  <subtitle />
  <id>https://tedebc.ufma.br/jspui/handle/tede/637</id>
  <updated>2026-06-30T21:24:24Z</updated>
  <dc:date>2026-06-30T21:24:24Z</dc:date>
  <entry>
    <title>O uso da inteligência artificial (ia) para elaboração de minutas de sentença em processos dos Juizados Especiais Federais do Maranhão: estudo comparativo de qualidade, sob a perspectiva de Robert Alexy, em distintos cenários de utilização</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://tedebc.ufma.br/jspui/handle/tede/7065" />
    <author>
      <name>OLIVEIRA NETO, Valdemar Gomes de</name>
    </author>
    <id>https://tedebc.ufma.br/jspui/handle/tede/7065</id>
    <updated>2026-06-24T17:46:12Z</updated>
    <published>2026-06-16T00:00:00Z</published>
    <summary type="text">Título: O uso da inteligência artificial (ia) para elaboração de minutas de sentença em processos dos Juizados Especiais Federais do Maranhão: estudo comparativo de qualidade, sob a perspectiva de Robert Alexy, em distintos cenários de utilização
Autor: OLIVEIRA NETO, Valdemar Gomes de
Primeiro orientador: BEZERRA, Eudes Vitor
Abstract: This dissertation empirically investigates the argumentative quality of sentences &#xD;
drafted by generative artificial intelligence compared with human judgments in the &#xD;
Federal Small Claims Courts of the Maranhão Judicial Section (JEFs/SJMA). The &#xD;
experimental design compares, case by case, the original human judgment with three &#xD;
synthetic sentences generated by Gemini 2.5 Pro across three scenarios: Free (open &#xD;
prompt), Directed (outcome indicated), and Controlled (structured report and &#xD;
normatively anchored prompt). The stratified sample comprises 300 cases covering &#xD;
banking civil liability, continued benefit for the elderly (BPC-I), and continued benefit &#xD;
for persons with disabilities (BPC-PCD). The 1,200 sentences were submitted to triple &#xD;
independent coding by a blind human evaluator, Claude Opus 4.5, and GPT-4.5, under &#xD;
an Alexy-derived six-dimension rubric (D1–D6), totaling 3,600 codings. Friedman, &#xD;
Wilcoxon, and Bonferroni tests demonstrate that AI-generated sentences present &#xD;
greater textual conformity with the D1–D6 rubric standards than human sentences, &#xD;
with very high statistical significance and very large effect size (Friedman χ²(3) &gt; 308; &#xD;
p &lt; 10⁻⁶⁶), with an identical hierarchy across all three independent evaluators: free &gt; &#xD;
directed &gt; controlled &gt; human. The correlation between the human evaluator and &#xD;
Claude Opus 4.5 (r = 0.936) provides robust evidence of instrument calibration. The &#xD;
largest differences concentrate in D3 (empirical external justification) and D5 &#xD;
(argumentative saturation), the dimensions most frequently weakened in mass &#xD;
litigation under Article 489, §1, of the Brazilian Civil Procedure Code. In the banking &#xD;
stratum (n=18), the human sentence outperforms the Directed and Controlled &#xD;
scenarios across all evaluators; the Free scenario, however, surpasses the human &#xD;
sentence in two of three evaluators, a finding that prevents generalizing human &#xD;
advantage in principiological matters to all AI modes. The automated verification &#xD;
workflow confirms 75.5% of suspicious marks in human sentences as real material &#xD;
inaccuracies (209/277), a pattern consistent with reused boilerplate judgments. The &#xD;
dissertation concludes that the integration of generative AI into mass litigation &#xD;
adjudication is empirically sustainable, provided it operates through protocols &#xD;
differentiated by argumentative complexity, namely controlled mode for rule-based and &#xD;
evidentiary matters and open or auxiliary mode for principiological matters, with &#xD;
qualified human review as a necessary and non-waivable condition. &#xD;
Keywords:
Instituição: Universidade Federal do Maranhão
Tipo do documento: Dissertação</summary>
    <dc:date>2026-06-16T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>As medidas despenalizadoras na justiça criminal negociada: uma análise no âmbito do 2º Juizado Especial Criminal em São Luís/MA.</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://tedebc.ufma.br/jspui/handle/tede/7064" />
    <author>
      <name>MELO , Anna Carollina de Oliveira Abreu</name>
    </author>
    <id>https://tedebc.ufma.br/jspui/handle/tede/7064</id>
    <updated>2026-06-24T17:25:38Z</updated>
    <published>2026-04-07T00:00:00Z</published>
    <summary type="text">Título: As medidas despenalizadoras na justiça criminal negociada: uma análise no âmbito do 2º Juizado Especial Criminal em São Luís/MA.
Autor: MELO , Anna Carollina de Oliveira Abreu
Primeiro orientador: VELOSO  , Roberto Carvalho
Abstract: This dissertation aims to analyze the development, application, and impacts of &#xD;
consensual criminal justice in the Brazilian legal system, with emphasis on the &#xD;
mechanisms provided by Law No. 9,099/1995 and the innovations introduced by the &#xD;
Non-Prosecution Agreement, established by Law No. 13,964/2019 (Anti-Crime &#xD;
Package). Based on the recognition of the serious structural crisis affecting the &#xD;
Brazilian criminal justice system, characterized by procedural delays, prison &#xD;
overcrowding, penal selectivity, and inefficiency in the State’s response, the study &#xD;
highlights the urgent need to adopt alternative models capable of overcoming the &#xD;
limitations of the traditional criminal system, without disregarding the fundamental &#xD;
rights and guarantees of individuals. Methodologically, the research adopts the &#xD;
inductive method, a socio-legal critical approach, the exploratory legal research &#xD;
method, and a quantitative-qualitative technique, combined with the empirical &#xD;
analysis of data extracted from official Judiciary databases, notably the TermoJuris &#xD;
system and the National Judicial Data Base (DataJud/CNJ). In this context, the study &#xD;
investigates the feasibility, benefits, and limits of Negotiated Criminal Law as an &#xD;
innovative and complementary model to traditional criminal prosecution, especially in &#xD;
cases involving minor offenses. The research outlines the theoretical and normative &#xD;
foundations of consensual justice, examines the evolution of Brazilian legislation, &#xD;
and compares international experiences, with emphasis on the American plea &#xD;
bargain, as well as the models adopted in Italy, Germany, and Portugal. Additionally, &#xD;
an empirical analysis is conducted based on data from the 2nd Special Criminal &#xD;
Court of São Luís/MA, focusing on the practical application of plea agreements such &#xD;
as criminal transaction and conditional suspension of the process, as well as their &#xD;
developments and challenges. It is argued that consensual mechanisms represent &#xD;
an effective, swift, and proportionate response to the challenges of the Brazilian &#xD;
criminal system, contributing to reducing the overload of the Judiciary, mass &#xD;
incarceration, and promoting fairer and more adequate solutions to the complexity of &#xD;
concrete cases. However, the study emphasizes the need for careful application of &#xD;
these instruments in order to ensure compliance with constitutional principles such &#xD;
as adversarial proceedings, full defense, legality, and voluntariness, thus preventing &#xD;
undue flexibilization of procedural guarantees and the worsening of social, racial, &#xD;
and economic inequalities historically present in the criminal system. Finally, the &#xD;
dissertation reinforces the importance of deepening the academic and political &#xD;
debate on consensual criminal justice, so that its implementation may effectively &#xD;
contribute to the modernization, democratization, and humanization of Brazilian &#xD;
criminal law and criminal procedure.
Instituição: Universidade Federal do Maranhão
Tipo do documento: Dissertação</summary>
    <dc:date>2026-04-07T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Direito fundamental ao meio ambiente ecologicamente equilibrado: análise da aplicação da sustentabilidade socioambiental nas contratações públicas no âmbito do Tribunal de Justiça do Estado do Maranhão</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://tedebc.ufma.br/jspui/handle/tede/7045" />
    <author>
      <name>SILVA, Bruna Sousa Mendes</name>
    </author>
    <id>https://tedebc.ufma.br/jspui/handle/tede/7045</id>
    <updated>2026-06-15T12:52:48Z</updated>
    <published>2026-05-08T00:00:00Z</published>
    <summary type="text">Título: Direito fundamental ao meio ambiente ecologicamente equilibrado: análise da aplicação da sustentabilidade socioambiental nas contratações públicas no âmbito do Tribunal de Justiça do Estado do Maranhão
Autor: SILVA, Bruna Sousa Mendes
Primeiro orientador: RAMOS, Paulo Roberto Barbosa
Abstract: This research, situated within the area of concentration Law and Institutions of the Justice System&#xD;
and linked to the research line Dynamics and Effectiveness of Institutions of the Justice System,&#xD;
aims to analyze how the observance of sustainability criteria and practices in public procurement&#xD;
is being carried out within the scope of the Maranhão State Judiciary, from 2021 to 2023, and its&#xD;
impact on the realization of the fundamental right to an ecologically balanced environment,&#xD;
considering the establishment of the sustainability policy implemented by the National Council of&#xD;
Justice (CNJ) and the regulation of the Sustainable Logistics Plan by the Court of Justice of the&#xD;
State of Maranhão. Thus, the hypothesis is that the sustainable measures applied in the phases&#xD;
related to public procurement constitute necessary mechanisms for environmental protection, as&#xD;
well as for enabling the sustainable development entrusted to the Public Administration. Therefore,&#xD;
&#xD;
to achieve the proposed objective, the inductive approach method was used, as well as the socio-&#xD;
legal-critical, legal-descriptive, and legal-diagnostic methods of procedure, with bibliographic and&#xD;
&#xD;
documentary research techniques. The results observed demonstrated that the adoption of&#xD;
sustainable guidelines in contracting represents a relevant instrument for achieving environmental&#xD;
sustainability.
Instituição: Universidade Federal do Maranhão
Tipo do documento: Dissertação</summary>
    <dc:date>2026-05-08T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Criminalidade violenta espacialmente localizada: reflexões críticas a partir de um diagnóstico socio-criminológico dos bairros Renascença e Cidade Olímpica</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://tedebc.ufma.br/jspui/handle/tede/6961" />
    <author>
      <name>NUNES, Alexandre Lobato</name>
    </author>
    <id>https://tedebc.ufma.br/jspui/handle/tede/6961</id>
    <updated>2026-05-13T18:22:47Z</updated>
    <published>2025-03-19T00:00:00Z</published>
    <summary type="text">Título: Criminalidade violenta espacialmente localizada: reflexões críticas a partir de um diagnóstico socio-criminológico dos bairros Renascença e Cidade Olímpica
Autor: NUNES, Alexandre Lobato
Primeiro orientador: GUIMARÃES, Claudio Alberto Gabriel
Abstract: Discussing human behavior related to actions that are classified as “normal” and others&#xD;
as “deviant” has always been at the center of human debates. After all, what justifies&#xD;
the criminal, deviant act. What drives an individual to commit a crime against their&#xD;
fellow human beings. Philosophy, sociology, and criminology have taken it upon&#xD;
themselves to propose theoretical bases to explain crime and the state's right to&#xD;
punish. These theories can be divided into two theoretical bases: consensus and&#xD;
conflict, with different, conflicting epistemological bases. The purpose of this paper was&#xD;
to present an approximation between two important categories for understanding crime&#xD;
in modern times: urban disorder, from the Chicago School, based on the theory of&#xD;
consensus, and the category of structural violence, coined by Alessandro Baratta and&#xD;
his critical criminology, with a theoretical alignment in the discourses of conflict. The&#xD;
Chicago School's urban and social disorder serves as a micro-sociological analysis,&#xD;
with an empirical basis for understanding the phenomenon of the spatiality of cities and&#xD;
&#xD;
the address of crime. The category of structural violence, from a more macro-&#xD;
sociological viewpoint, anchors a connection between class interests and the great&#xD;
&#xD;
inequalities that exist in cities, also pointing to those who classify what is “normal” and&#xD;
what is “deviant.” Once the theory has been established, two neighborhoods in São&#xD;
Luís with antagonistic data on intentional violent crimes in the years 2017-2021 were&#xD;
used to demonstrate that the CEP of certain crimes, such as intentional violent crimes&#xD;
(IVC), are generally associated with a great deal of structural and social urban disorder,&#xD;
perusing as a solution that public security policies should be thought of in parallel with&#xD;
public safety policies, attacking urban disorder and structural violence in a planned&#xD;
way.
Instituição: Universidade Federal do Maranhão
Tipo do documento: Dissertação</summary>
    <dc:date>2025-03-19T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
</feed>

